On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 14:35 +0300, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > >> Can you give a bit more info on the Tx-sync approach, for the uninitiated? >> I'm also thinking that maybe we could somehow treat the sleeping-GO as >> a special case (maybe with some special code and a HW flag). Right now >> I'm not sure the wl12xx FW even supports it. > > I basically had a simpler version in mind, something like this: > http://p.sipsolutions.net/cd928e926a941ac7.txt If the low level driver has to prepare for each such Tx, that's fine. But does this somehow rely on the timing of the Tx? Relying on op_tx to come right after this seems racy. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
