Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC v3 7/7] mac80211: reuse channels for channel contexts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 14:37 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:

> +static enum nl80211_channel_type
> +ieee80211_calc_chantype(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> +			struct ieee80211_chanctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct ieee80211_chanctx_conf *conf = &ctx->conf;
> +	struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
> +	enum nl80211_channel_type chantype = NL80211_CHAN_NO_HT;
> +	enum nl80211_channel_type compat;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&local->chanctx_mtx);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdata, &local->interfaces, list) {
> +		if (!ieee80211_sdata_running(sdata))
> +			continue;
> +		if (sdata->vif.chanctx_conf != conf)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		BUG_ON(!ieee80211_channel_types_are_compatible(
> +				conf->channel_type, chantype, &compat));

Please no BUG_ON, maybe only WARN_ON_ONCE even?

> +		chantype = compat;
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	return chantype;
> +}

I don't think I understand this, wouldn't it need some per-vif requested
channel type to work correctly? I don't see any chantype values coming
from the sdata here, so I don't think this could work?

If say vif1 needs ht40+ and vif2 ht20, the channel context will be set
to ht40+, but then if vif1 goes away and you don't know anything about
vif2 at all, then how can this work? The way I see it, your code here
doesn't really do anything, except recalculate that ht40+ is compatible
with ht40+, or something like that? I guess I'm a bit confused, it seems
to me that this cannot work even in theory unless you have per-vif data.


>  static void
>  ieee80211_unassign_vif_chanctx(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
>  			       struct ieee80211_chanctx *ctx)
> @@ -248,6 +302,8 @@ ieee80211_unassign_vif_chanctx(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
>  
>  	drv_unassign_vif_chanctx(sdata->local, sdata, ctx);
>  
> +	ieee80211_recalc_chanctx_chantype(sdata->local, ctx);
> +
>  	ctx->refcount--;
>  	sdata->vif.chanctx_conf = NULL;

And then shouldn't you recalc *after* setting chanctx_conf = NULL so you
skip this vif?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux