Hi Mohammed, 2012/6/20 Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Matt, > >> Both 0x2f and 0x2d can work fine to me of enabling >> wiphy_rfkill_start_polling() in gpio.c:ath_start_rfkill_poll(). >> >> 1) with 0x2f >> 0x404c address would change when press wifi button >> rfkill block : yes -> 0x00000455 >> rfkill block : no -> 0x00000c55 >> 2) with 0x2d >> 0x404c address would change when press wifi button >> rfkill block : yes -> 0x00000455 >> rfkill block : no -> 0x00000c55 >> >> >> But I don't see the LED is changing, it is staying OFF (Amber). > > not sure about that, but i think rfkill is working for both of us > i told 0xeed changes to 0x6ed for me > > you got 0x455 changes to 0xc55 > > BIT 12(GPIO pin 11 seems to toggle 4 ->C), you can confirm by rfkill list Would it be the patch to fix it ? or it is just a workaround to prove the rfkill_poll can be enabled ? > -- > thanks, > shafi > -- Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
