Ben Greear wrote:
> We're using WPEA-127N. We have a dual-core Atom for one system, and
> a quad-core i7 CPU (and two wifi NICs) in another system.. So far, the Atom with
> single NIC is benchmarking better in some tests. We were only using one of
> the NICs in the i7 for testing, but maybe there is still some interference
> or maybe we just had bad antenna placement or something.
Fiddling with antenna position/placement does help.
> What chipset or brand/model is this? I see that XB112 mentioned in the WPEA-127N
> description, but maybe that is just a form-factor description?
XB112 is the board and I am using an engineering sample. The WLAN chipset
is AR9380.
> Can you offer any additional details on how you tested this? You are using the same
> NIC for both AP and station?
>
> Open-air connection?
>
> How far away is AP?
>
> I would like to try to reproduce this result, as it is significantly better
> than what I'm seeing.
>
> Are you doing any special AP tuning, like using short-guard-intervals
> or similar? Care to post the wpa_supplicant and hostapd config files?
I am using a DB120 as AP which has dual radio - AR9340/AR9300. The setup is
standard:
STA --------------> AP -------------------> CONSOLE
wlan/OTA gig-ethernet
The AP runs an internal BSP/SDK build and is positioned about 4-5 feet from
the Station. As for the HT parameters, HT40 and short-GI is enabled in both
bands.
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
