Hi Holger, Thanks a bunch for your response! I had read about ANI before on the list, it would be interesting to know if this is the cause for this. It definitely seems plausible. I will dig around the ath9k code and see if I can narrow down this to the cause. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:31 PM, George Nychis <gnychis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Holger, > > Thanks a bunch for your response! I had read about ANI before on the > list, it would be interesting to know if this is the cause for this. It > definitely seems plausible. I will dig around the ath9k code and see if I > can narrow down this to the cause. > > - George > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Holger Schurig > <holgerschurig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> This is probably due to ANI (adapative noise immunity). I think ath9k >> does too much here, in other words: it doesn't just kick in if there >> are too strong signals there. Instead it seems to always adjust the >> input attenuator, needed or not. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
