On 9 mei 2012, at 18:33, Anisse Astier <anisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 7 May 2012 21:18:50 +0800, Zero Lin (林瑞青) <zero.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote : > >> Dear Gertjan, >> >> I am sorry, what should I do now? >> Re-send a patch? > > I think what Gertjan meant is that you should resend the first version of > you patch with the 0x539b in the correct position. > > The problem with the V2 of your patch was that it was on top of your first > version, therefore not usable separately. That is exactly what I meant. And sorry for not responding earlier. I'm just very busy at the moment with very little time for my linux related hobby :-( >> >> BR, >> Zero >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gertjan van Wingerde [mailto:gwingerde@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 8:40 PM >> To: Zero Lin >> Cc: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; John Linville; Zero Lin (林瑞青) >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00:Add RT539B chipset support V2 >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Zero Lin <zero.lin.0203@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> From: "Zero.Lin" <Zero.Lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zero.Lin <Zero.Lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I'm sorry, but you will have to do this as a complete new patch replacing your old one, not as an incremental to your initial patch. > > Regards, > > Anisse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
