On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:30:24AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 11:44 +0300, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > > > >> - case NL80211_IFTYPE_UNSPECIFIED: > > >> - case NUM_NL80211_IFTYPES: > > >> + default: > > > > > > When did this warning start occurring? I was pretty sure it didn't use > > > to? I think we should explicitly list the cases here though because we > > > want the compiler to warn here when we add something to the interface > > > type list so we catch this place that may have to be modified. > > > > I think warning occurs when I added new interface type since it is > > also not handled. > > Well, but in that case the warning is supposed to happen to tell you > that you need to think about that code for your new interface type. > > John, please revert this patch. I'm having to do some rebasing to handle the bluetooth kerfuffle. I'll simply drop this patch. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
