On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:01 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote: >> If a mesh peer indicates it is operating as 20MHz-only in its HT >> operation IE, have the rate control algorithm respect this by disabling >> the equivalent bit in the ieee80211_sta HT capabilities. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c | 6 ++++++ >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c b/net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c >> index f4124d7..6209327 100644 >> --- a/net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c >> +++ b/net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c >> @@ -302,6 +302,12 @@ static struct sta_info *mesh_peer_init(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, >> else >> memset(&sta->sta.ht_cap, 0, sizeof(sta->sta.ht_cap)); >> >> + if (elems->ht_operation) >> + if (!(elems->ht_operation->ht_param & >> + IEEE80211_HT_PARAM_CHAN_WIDTH_ANY)) >> + sta->sta.ht_cap.cap &= >> + ~IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40; > > The double if is a bit odd, why not use && to clean up all the > formatting? Good point, but later Ashok adds a patch which takes the same branch anyway. Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
