On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:54 -0700, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This based on an idea posted by Stanislaw Gruszka, > though I accept full blame for the implementation! > > This has been tested with ath9k. > > The idea is to let users scan on the current operating > channel without interrupting normal traffic more than > absolutely necessary (changing power level might reset > some hardware, for instance). Seems OK to me now. I might change the subject/description a bit to note that really it's not an "option" but an optimisation if the user requests a single-channel on-channel scan, but ultimately I don't really care all that much. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
