On 04/14/2012 11:36 PM, Larry Finger wrote: > On 04/14/2012 04:00 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> put back 0x050d,0x7050 to rt73usb, same usb_id for two chips: >> >> K7SF5D7050A ver 2xxx is rt2500 >> K7SF5D7050B ver 3xxx is rt73 >> >> <http://en-us-support.belkin.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/297/kw/K7SF5D7050> >> >> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez<xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> > I did a quick look at the rt2500 driver and did not see any code > that detects what version chip is being read. If it is possible > to determine if it is ver 2xxx and not 3xxx, then the probe > routine should do that and return an error if the wrong driver > is being loaded. A similar situation arises in the Realtek PCI > devices. In that case, it is a PCI revision that allows a driver > to reject the wrong hardware. This is just a patch to return to the original situation. (0x050d, 0x7050) was deleted by commit 08b8099c128d601fd675b212ef8b10397706b633 [1], and I was wrong. [1] <http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=08b8099c128d601fd675b212ef8b10397706b633> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
