On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Anisse, > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:33, Anisse Astier <anisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Anisse Astier <anisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> [1] I have many of both, in RT5390(rev 1502) and RT5390F(rev 0502) models. All non working are rev 1502, even if some rev 1502 are working. >> >> To clarify, Revs 0502, marked RT5390L are all working, and can be >> ignored for the purpose of this discussion. >> >> The only non-working revs are 1502, which is the model marked >> "RT5390RL". This model has zero google results apart from this >> discussion, so I'm guessing it might be new, hence not much tested and >> not supported. > > This is likely to be the case, I'm sure that the rt2x00 developers > will probably have support in the driver once RaLink gives them the > code / info needed. > >> Why some cards work and others don't is a mystery. > > Not really, old cards generally work, current cards that have been out > for a little while generally work, and bleeding edge, > just-released-yesterday cards tend not to. What I meant is that in the set of RT5390RL cards, some work, some don't, consistently, and I cannot find any difference between them. > > In general, the kernel developers only add support for a card once > it's been released. Indeed, and once someone reports they exist ;-) > > Thanks, > > -- > Julian Calaby > > Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx > Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ > .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
