Search Linux Wireless

Re: deadlock in ath9k, 3.3.0+ kernel.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Greear wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 09:34 AM, Manoharan, Sujith wrote:
> > Patch sent:  http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=133282325727326&w=2
> 
> My 3.3.0 ath9k code doesn't look like that patch at all.  Is some
> extra back-porting needed for 3.3.0???
> 
> 
> static void ath_node_attach(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
> 			    struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> {
> 	struct ath_node *an;
> 	an = (struct ath_node *)sta->drv_priv;
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_ATH9K_DEBUGFS
> 	spin_lock(&sc->nodes_lock);
> 	list_add(&an->list, &sc->nodes);
> 	spin_unlock(&sc->nodes_lock);
> #endif
> 	an->sta = sta;
> 	an->vif = vif;
> 	if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_TXAGGR) {
> 		ath_tx_node_init(sc, an);
> 		an->maxampdu = 1 << (IEEE80211_HT_MAX_AMPDU_FACTOR +
> 				     sta->ht_cap.ampdu_factor);
> 		an->mpdudensity = parse_mpdudensity(sta->ht_cap.ampdu_density);
> 	}
> }

Yeah, this looks like a different issue. What does decodecode (in scripts/ in the kernel
source tree) show ?

Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux