On 04/02/2012 12:57 PM, Forest Bond wrote:
Hi Larry,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:54:01PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 04/02/2012 09:25 AM, Forest Bond wrote:
From: Forest Bond<forest.bond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The previous definitions included both {B,C,D,E}_CUT_VERSION and
CHIP_92D_{C,D}_CUT with conflicting values for the C and D cut versions,
and literal hex values were used in the IS_92D_{C,D,E}_CUT macros. So
we clean all this up and in doing so enable cut-specific code paths for
cuts C and D, which would not have been executed because the
CHIP_92D_{C,D}_CUT constants were wrong and the cut version was thus
recorded incorrectly.
Signed-off-by: Forest Bond<forest.bond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch does not apply to the wireless-testing tree. That is the
one you are supposed to use.
Patch #2 also fails to apply. In addition, your mailer mangled a line.
Sorry for the trouble. I'll resend a little later this afternoon.
No problem for me. I was able to fix everything but the mangling with wiggle.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
