Hello On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 02:09:14PM +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote: > Why should we use PIFS for the beacon? Is that what the ralink drivers > are doing? Hmm, seems that is my own invention. I thought that should be used for beacons, but currently I can only find in docs, that this is only needed for entering PCF. > > + else if (!(tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_FIRST_FRAGMENT)) > > + txdesc->u.ht.txop = TXOP_SIFS; > > + else > > + txdesc->u.ht.txop = TXOP_BACKOFF; > > + > > + txdesc->u.ht.mcs = txrate->idx; > > + > > This lacks short preamble handling. Something like: > > if (txrate->flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_USE_SHORT_PREAMBLE) > txdesc->u.ht.mcs |= 0x08; > > Actually, you could just shuffle the code a bit such that the rate setup > happens before all the HT stuff, no? Make sense. Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
