Search Linux Wireless

RE: Dell E6400 + Windows XP can not work on intel N-6205 AP mode for compat-wireless-2012-03-18.tar.bz2 package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+ Rakesh/Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:40 AM
To: Zhong, Hongbo
Cc: wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cao, Qingtao (Harry); Gao, Guijin; Cabuk, Yusuf; Foglia, Michael; Intel Linux Wireless; Zhan, Rongkai (Mark)
Subject: Re: Dell E6400 + Windows XP can not work on intel N-6205 AP mode for compat-wireless-2012-03-18.tar.bz2 package

Hi Zhong,

> Mar 23 12:44:48 localhost hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a IEEE 
> 802.11: authenticated Mar 23 12:44:48 localhost hostapd: wlan0: STA 
> 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a IEEE 802.11: associated (aid 1) Mar 23 12:44:48 
> localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 sending 0 
> filtered/0 PS frames since STA not sleeping anymore Mar 23 12:44:50 
> localhost last message repeated 3 times Mar 23 12:44:51 localhost 
> hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a IEEE 802.11: deauthenticated due 
> to local deauth request Mar 23 12:44:53 localhost hostapd: wlan0: STA 
> 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a IEEE 802.11: authenticated Mar 23 12:44:53 localhost 
> hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a IEEE 802.11: associated (aid 1) 
> Mar 23 12:44:53 localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 
> sending 0 filtered/0 PS frames since STA not sleeping anymore Mar 23 
> 12:44:55 localhost last message repeated 3 times

This is a bit strange -- any idea what was happening at this time? It seems to repeat for quite a while until it finally associates properly:

> Mar 23 12:45:16 localhost hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a IEEE 
> 802.11: authenticated Mar 23 12:45:16 localhost hostapd: wlan0: STA 
> 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a IEEE 802.11: associated (aid 1) Mar 23 12:45:17 
> localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 sending 0 
> filtered/0 PS frames since STA not sleeping anymore Mar 23 12:45:17 
> localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 sending 0 
> filtered/0 PS frames since STA not sleeping anymore Mar 23 12:45:17 
> localhost kernel: br0: port 1(wlan0) entering forwarding state Mar 23 
> 12:45:18 localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 sending 
> 0 filtered/0 PS frames since STA not sleeping anymore Mar 23 12:45:18 
> localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 sending 0 
> filtered/0 PS frames since STA not sleeping anymore Mar 23 12:45:18 
> localhost hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a RADIUS: starting 
> accounting session 4F6C702C-00000000 Mar 23 12:45:18 localhost 
> hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a WPA: pairwise key handshake 
> completed (RSN)

Is it possible that the system you're running the AP on doesn't have enough entropy to do the 4-way handshake earlier?

> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP 
> Server 4.2.1-P1 Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: Copyright 2004-2011 Internet Systems Consortium.
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: All rights reserved.
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: For info, please visit 
> https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: Wrote 0 leases to leases file.
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: Listening on LPF/br0/a0:88:b4:18:64:a0/192.168.0.0/24
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: Sending on   LPF/br0/a0:88:b4:18:64:a0/192.168.0.0/24
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: 
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth0 (128.224.163.192).
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: ** Ignoring requests on eth0.  If this is not what
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd:    you want, please write a subnet declaration
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd:    in your dhcpd.conf file for the network segment
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd:    to which interface eth0 is attached. **
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: 
> Mar 23 12:45:48 localhost dhcpd: Sending on   Socket/fallback/fallback-net

Are you really starting dhcpd this late, after the client connected?
Does the client then even get a proper IP address?

> Mar 23 12:45:57 localhost dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a 
> via br0 Mar 23 12:45:57 localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a 
> aid 1 exits power save mode Mar 23 12:45:57 localhost kernel: wlan0: 
> STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 sending 0 filtered/0 PS frames since STA 
> not sleeping anymore Mar 23 12:45:57 localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 
> 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 enters power save mode Mar 23 12:45:58 
> localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a aid 1 exits power save 
> mode Mar 23 12:45:58 localhost kernel: wlan0: STA 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a 
> aid 1 sending 0 filtered/0 PS frames since STA not sleeping anymore 
> Mar 23 12:45:58 localhost dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.52 to 
> 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a (PEK-IT-L5) via br0 Mar 23 12:45:58 localhost dhcpd: 
> DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.0.52 (192.168.0.1) from 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a 
> (PEK-IT-L5) via br0 Mar 23 12:45:58 localhost dhcpd: DHCPACK on 
> 192.168.0.52 to 00:1f:e2:cc:f5:0a (PEK-IT-L5) via br0

Ok, I guess it looks like it does get an IP address.

The remainder of this log looks perfectly normal, just like you'd expect with a client in powersave.

Do you think you could get a wireless sniffer and record over-the-air traffic?

johannes

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux