Hi On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:58:45PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: > > Hm. I obviously did check whether FW load does overwrite WPDMA_GLO_CFG > > and it didn't. Maybe it's device dependent? What bothers me is that now > > we have a (very) short window between FW load and disabling DMA. > > Stupid question: why not disable DMA before the FW load, then disable > it afterwards just to make sure the hardware's in a known state after > the FW load? - this will catch any errant firmwares out there and > (mostly) eliminate the window between FW load and DMA disabling. Yep, that seems to be the best approach. Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
