Search Linux Wireless

Re: Problems with regulatory domain support and BCM43224

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/21/2012 03:19 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:05:40PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 03/20/2012 11:07 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:06:57PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Hi, Seth

Noticed your email yesterday, but did not get to chime into the
conversation. brcmsmac does indeed provide a regulatory hint, which is
either from SPROM or hard-coded to "US". Since "X0" is not a known
regulatory domain for crda it does not make sense to pass it as a regulatory
hint. However, the "full" story is told on linuxwireless.org (see [1]).

The Linux kernel allows you to define custom regulatory domains, the
ath module uses these, it defines 13 of them. You can review that code
for an example of how to use them. So your X0 can still be used, you
just have to define the data structure.

I took a shot at implementing custom regulatory domain support for
brcmsmac. I've got it working to the point of letting me see APs on the
DFS channels at least. The patch is below. A number of issues
undoubtedly remain to be resolved. Some that I can think of:

Hi Seth,

Thanks for looking into this. I also did some tinkering over here,
but not sure which way to go here, ie. 1) define and use custom
regulatory domains, or 2) be happy with world regulatory domain as
is and do not pass the custom codes if found in sprom.

For 2 I think you also have to set WIPGHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY or else
the default world domain will still be applied. That certainly seems to
be the quick-and-easy fix, but I'm not sure about what's preferable.

However, I do think that passing up the custom codes as hints doesn't
make sense, and the patch I sent only passes it up if it's not known to
be one of the custom domains.

Ok. so the wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() does not make the custom domains known by their code (.alpha2).

  - I set up two custom domains, X0 and X2, which are identical. I'm not
    sure precisely how each needs to be set up, but I took a reasonable
    guess.

There are 9 custom domains in the proprietary driver. X0 only allows
using channels 1-11. X2 allows 1-13. There are other parameters like
rates and txpower that may differ.

That's the kind if information I would need to make this patch viable.
I'll go ahead and update the patch to remove channels 12-13 from X0, and
14 from both. Are the 5 GHz rules correct?

5G channels are all considered passive by brcmsmac. Not sure whether that should be made explicit in the rules. Also the driver does not support IBSS so those flags are redundant now, but it is good to have it already in place.

Are the custom domains named X[0-8]? If that's the case I can simplify
some of the code.

Unfortunately, no.

  - I tried to integrate with the existing X2 domain support, but this
    could probably be improved. I avoided making large changes because
    there's some complexity in the current code that doesn't seem to
    serve a purpose currently, but I assume it's there for a reason.

The code in channel.c was taken from our proprietary driver.
Basically, the LOCALES hold the same information as the rules in
regdomain.

I assumed as much, but I haven't made much of an effort to understand it
yet.

But the complexity I'm referring to is really the infrastructure to
support multiple locales and revisions that just isn't used right now. I
can only assume that there are plans to use additional locales and
revisions at some point.

Understood. The proprietary driver (which is not a mac80211 driver) supports a lot of locales, which are selected on country code and regulatory revision (both read from sprom). I suspect this is done to support the regulatory rules for which the device was certified. Revisiting channel.c is on our work list, but it would mean more moving toward using the regdomain approach you started on instead of locales.

  - The flow of the initialization and organization of the code make it
    necessary to search through the list of custom regulatory domains
    many times. It would be nice to improve upon this.

Does this look to be on the right track?


Looks good. I will see if I can map the LOCALES for these to
regdomain rules.

Great! Thanks for you comments.

Seth


Gr. AvS

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux