On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:01:05PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 12 March 2012 18:11, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Exposing it as either an smbios table or in ACPI somewhere would be the > >> two most typical methods for doing this. It's easy to spec an ACPI table > >> for it if you think there'd be any vendor interest. > > > > Better than what we have today, no alternative proposal. > > Is there any current "vendor space" in ACPI that we can write to and > leverage as a kind of example test case? Not really. In theory the ACPI namespace is only usable if you've pushed something through the ACPI process - in practice, grabbing a table name first and asking questions later tends to work fine. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
