Johannes Berg wrote: > Technically, but that would be assuming it's implemented everywhere ... > if it was tested by the WFA we'd implement it :-) Heh :) > Also, in order to actually implement it in AP mode we need to use the > "RC update only". > > I think it makes more sense to unify the handling here -- change rate > control (and also tell the driver, like one of my patches did) rather > than treating 20/40 changes in managed mode differently than in AP mode. Agreed. Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html