On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:49:54PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:43 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:07:57PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > I was actually thinking of using just del_timer(), but now that I think > > > about it, should anything prevent us from using del_timer_sync() inside > > > ieee80211_free_tid_rx? > > > > Yes, call_rcu() callback can not sleep. Depending of RCU implementation > > callback can run with bottom half disabled. > > del_timer_sync() doesn't really *sleep* though, even if it waits, so it > should be fine? Indeed, I'll change the patch and post officially. Thanks Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
