On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 12:19 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 18 March 2012 03:19, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm not sure I can believe this -- surely the firmware has to have a way > > of dealing with stations that can't do 40 MHz and stations that can, so > > switching between the two doesn't seem like a major proposal? We also > > don't currently handle the action frames for that, but it seems like we > > should. > > > > Note, however, that we're now discussing something already done -- > > Paul's patch already removed the channel type update when all we wanted > > was update the RC. > > When are stations being notified of a CWM change? > I know FreeBSD handles it with a big stick at the moment - it just > does a full interface reset and channel change. I don't necessarily > like it, but I haven't yet sat down to look at when and why this is > occuring. I'm not convinced this is the right thing to do -- we kinda do/did the same thing but we want to change TX bandwidth for the AP peer, not RX (channel) bandwidth. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
