On 9 March 2012 23:35, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 22:40 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> .. hm, I was wondering about SMPS. Why not RTS? Wouldn't that >> wake up the other RX chains? > > (corrected to RTS) > > That would be "dynamic SMPS", "static SMPS" means your chains are truly > turned off and can't even be revived by RTS. Ok. I'll start tinkering with this soon in FreeBSD, so I'll do some interoperability testing with ath9k+FreeBSD and whatever else I can get my hands on. I'll report back if things behave strangely. Adrian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
