Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC/WIP 16/22] ath9k_hw: Use CONFIG_ATH9K_BTCOEX_SUPPORT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julian Calaby wrote:
> If I recall correctly, the recommended form here is to create a inline
> function that returns false, rather than the #define - this way the
> type checking of the function's arguments still happens when
> CONFIG_ATH9K_BTCOEX_SUPPORT is disabled.

Right, that would be more elegant.

> You've done this a couple of other times in this patch too.

I'll fix them in the next iteration, thanks for the review.

Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux