On 17 February 2012 13:47, David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> These are mostly minor changes and they are being sent as one >> patch only in order to cause the smallest amount of disruption. > > A lot of these changes don't seem to match what I thought the > linux kernel code style is. > > eg: >> void cfg80211_bss_age(struct cfg80211_registered_device *dev, >> - unsigned long age_secs); >> + unsigned long age_secs); > Args no longer lined up. It's ligned up here, perhaps mine (or yours) mail client is screwing something up. This one was basically using tabs where they were supposed to be. > >> - pos = (u8 *) & hdr->addr4; >> + pos = (u8 *) &hdr->addr4; > no space after cast? There is a space there. The problem pointed by checkpatch was the space between '&' and hdr. > >> - p1 = (u8*)(ht_capa); >> + p1 = (u8 *)(ht_capa); > Still extra (). > > I'm also not sure (personally) this sort of churn is useful. As mentioned, those are mostly minor changes based on checkpatch's output. Cleaning up only things that were specifically marked as errors (so the extra parentheses there were not reported). I don't think having lots of this kind of churn useful, thats why I sent one patch only for the entire directory trying to clean up as much as possible. There are some errors that I didn't clean up, but they are mostly where an option was made on the source code to keep code in a more readable way. --lf > > David > > -- Luís Felipe Strano Moraes Project Manager @ ProFUSION embedded systems http://profusion.mobi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
