On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:17 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > On 11/08/2011 09:10 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > FYI -- I'm going to test this a bit more but I am going to put it in. > > The code is a mess -- look at how much code I remove below (and that's > > after everybody elses cleanups!) for a dubious optimisation. > > > > I agree that we should address this and we need to really do this to not > > mess up our aggregation state, but the current code is too complex and > > causing too many issues. We also need to think about this in the context > > of multi-virtual-channel support. > > Well crap. Why don't you try to fix it right instead? > > I'll probably end up carrying this in my own tree so > that multiple vifs work well and don't constantly > reset the ath9k causing it to shit itself... Given the auth/assoc redesign that went in now, are you still carrying this? Does the redesign address your problem? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
