Hi, On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 16:45 +0100, Alexander Schnaidt wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I've recently started to notice wireless failures -- after being > > connected for a few minutes, the connection dies. Other devices on > > the same network continue to work. 'iw dev wlan0 disconnect' will fix > > it. > > > > I'm not at all sure, but I think this is a 3.2 regression. My kernel > > is 3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64. > Hi! > > I am experiencing a similar regression on every kernel >=3.2. > Connected to a wpa protected AP, every application > loses it's connection after a period of time. If I let it be, it > eventually reconnects > and continues for a while until the cycle repeats itself. > > 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Ultimate N WiFi Link 5300 > Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 1011 > Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48 > Memory at f2500000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K] > Capabilities: <access denied> > Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi > > Networkmanager, netcfg or wicd do not report any problems. The logs > are clean and only ever mention the reconnection-event itself. > > Now, running wpa_supplicant interactively spits out some info: > > [alex@lx200s ~]$ sudo wpa_supplicant -D wext -i wlan0 -c wpstest.conf > Password: > Trying to associate with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d (SSID='MyFancyAP' freq=2417 MHz) > Associated with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d > WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d [PTK=TKIP GTK=TKIP] > CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - Connection to 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d > completed (auth) [id=0 id_str=] > WPA: Group rekeying completed with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d [GTK=TKIP] > WPA: Group rekeying completed with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d [GTK=TKIP] > CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:1f:3f:13:47:1d reason=0 > Trying to associate with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d (SSID='MyFancyAP' freq=2417 MHz) > Associated with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d > WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d [PTK=TKIP GTK=TKIP] > CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - Connection to 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d > completed (reauth) [id=0 id_str=] > ^CCTRL-EVENT-TERMINATING - signal 2 received > > The connection *always* stalls at the second group rekeying event. > When the third group rekeying happens wpa_supplicant(?) re-associates the > connection and the cycle repeats. > > Here's the the dmesg output during the time frame: > > [ 126.172145] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: L1 Disabled; Enabling L0S > [ 126.172530] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Radio type=0x0-0x2-0x0 > [ 126.322917] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: L1 Disabled; Enabling L0S > [ 126.323315] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Radio type=0x0-0x2-0x0 > [ 129.644682] wlan0: authenticate with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d (try 1) > [ 129.647687] wlan0: authenticated > [ 129.649798] wlan0: associate with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d (try 1) > [ 129.653886] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d > (capab=0x31 status=0 aid=2) > [ 129.653895] wlan0: associated > [ 1506.536175] wlan0: deauthenticated from 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d (Reason: 2) > [ 1506.600035] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain > [ 1509.857439] wlan0: authenticate with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d (try 1) > [ 1509.860511] wlan0: authenticated > [ 1509.862438] wlan0: associate with 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d (try 1) > [ 1509.866443] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:1f:3f:13:47:1d > (capab=0x31 status=0 aid=2) > [ 1509.866451] wlan0: associated > > At 1506.5 the re-association happens. > > I can't influence the interval of the wpa rekeying of my wlan-router, so I'm > not sure if this is related. > The amount of network traffic doesn't seem to influence this behavior, either. > > I tried to bisect it but ended up at: > > commit 3c607d27c818cf4a5d28f2c73b18a88f8fbdfa33 > Author: Don Fry <donald.h.fry@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Sep 30 11:40:20 2011 -0700 > > iwlagn: rename iwlagn module iwlwifi and alias to iwlagn. > > Rename the iwlagn module as iwlwifi in preparation for future > changes. Add an alias to iwlagn for backward compatibility. > > Signed-off-by: Don Fry <donald.h.fry@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > That doesn't make a lot of sense to me but I wanted to mention it > > I'll gladly provide more info. I agree that does not make much sense, but we will take a look into it. btw, could you try the attach patch and see if it help? thanks Wey > > _______________________________________________ > ilw mailing list > ilw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://linux.intel.com/mailman/listinfo/ilw
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c index d9d758e..1b70048 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static void iwlagn_tx_cmd_build_basic(struct iwl_priv *priv, tx_flags |= TX_CMD_FLG_SEQ_CTL_MSK; else tx_flags &= ~TX_CMD_FLG_SEQ_CTL_MSK; + tx_cmd->tid_tspec = IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT; } iwlagn_tx_cmd_protection(priv, info, fc, &tx_flags); @@ -808,6 +809,8 @@ static void iwl_rx_reply_tx_agg(struct iwl_priv *priv, u32 status = le16_to_cpu(tx_resp->status.status); int i; + WARN_ON(tid == IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT); + if (agg->wait_for_ba) IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "got tx response w/o block-ack\n"); @@ -1035,10 +1038,12 @@ int iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb, } __skb_queue_head_init(&skbs); - priv->tid_data[sta_id][tid].next_reclaimed = next_reclaimed; - IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d", - next_reclaimed); + if (tid != IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT) { + priv->tid_data[sta_id][tid].next_reclaimed = next_reclaimed; + IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d", + next_reclaimed); + } /*we can free until ssn % q.n_bd not inclusive */ WARN_ON(iwl_trans_reclaim(trans(priv), sta_id, tid, txq_id, diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie.c index aa87994..fa1b369 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie.c @@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ static int iwl_trans_pcie_reclaim(struct iwl_trans *trans, int sta_id, int tid, txq->time_stamp = jiffies; - if (unlikely(txq_id >= IWLAGN_FIRST_AMPDU_QUEUE && + if (unlikely(tid != IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT && txq_id >= IWLAGN_FIRST_AMPDU_QUEUE && txq_id != trans_pcie->agg_txq[sta_id][tid])) { /* * FIXME: this is a uCode bug which need to be addressed,