On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 15:52 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> > I haven't kept track, and I have no idea why it wouldn't be?
>
> The patches didn't apply. I haven't taken the time yet to work it out.
>
> If you would like to repost a patchset that applies cleanly on top
> of the current base, that would probably speed it up. :-)
Ok, so ... you're going to run into issues either way. The reason they
don't apply to wireless-next is that I created them on top of
wireless-testing, and that has
commit bc4934bc61d0a11fd62c5187ff83645628f8be8b
Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jan 18 14:10:25 2012 +0100
mac80211: fix work removal on deauth request
which my patches are diffed against. I could rediff them against
wireless-next, but then you're going to run into merge issues when you
try to merge that back -- it may be easier to put the commit above into
wireless-next as well to avoid this?
In any case, let me know what you want me to do -- it may have to wait a
bit as I'm travelling back home tomorrow, only to leave again on Sunday
for more travel.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
