On 2012-01-28 8:17 PM, Daniel Halperin wrote: > (BUT @Felix: maybe max_tp_rate2 shouldn't use RTS/CTS---it's still > trying to be aggressive, whereas max_prob_rate is the one where you > *really* want the packet to get through. So maybe the first half of > Marek's patch is worth keeping, though it *should* be a marginal > difference in normal operating environments.) I thought about this as well, but decided to keep it even for max_tp_rate2, since with long A-MPDUs, the extra time needed by RTS/CTS compared to the A-MPDU transmission time isn't that much, and max_prob_rate is usually quite a bit slower. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
