Helmut Schaa schrieb: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Andreas Hartmann > <andihartmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> As promised, I repeated the test before with another AP. The >> destination host of netperf was the same. See below! > > So, in total it looks a little bit better then with the rt2800pci AP > but still the airtime is distributed not equally but the Ralink STA > seems to get a higher amount of airtime :(. Well, the amount of sent data from AP -> STA is much higher with rt2860 based AP. So, the density is higher as with the Linksys WAP. Could this be a problem for ath9k? But ath9k runs very well, if the conditions are better (not as much disruption). The rt2860 based AP feels smoother than the Linksys WAP. If the reverse way could be optimized, it would be a great AP :-). But you have to take into consideration, that the rt2860 AP resides directly on PCI and isn't restricted to fast ethernet. The throughput peaks with the rt2860 based AP where about 14 MBit/s (-> xosview). These couldn't be seen with the Linksys WAP. > > Maybe the ralink driver treats the channel access parameters > differently? Don't know. Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
