On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:34:50AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This is basically just a cleanup. Large positive numbers get counted as
> negative but then get implicitly cast to positive again for the checks
> that matter.
>
> This does make a small difference in ipw_handle_promiscuous_rx() when we
> test "if (unlikely((len + IPW_RX_FRAME_SIZE) > skb_tailroom(rxb->skb)))"
> It should return there, but we don't return until a couple lines later
> when we test "if (len > IPW_RX_BUF_SIZE - sizeof(struct ipw_rt_hdr)) {".
> The difference is that in the second test the sizeof() means that there
> is an implied cast to unsigned.
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Not sure if making it "unsinged int" would be better, but this change is
fine to me as is too.
Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
