On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:11:50PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2012/1/11 John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > +config B43_BCMA_EXTRA > > + bool "Support for devices also supported by brcmsmac" > > + depends on B43_BCMA > > + default n > > + > > Is this really *the* solution? I wonder if we can do whatever you're > trying to do in a better way? To let final users try both drivers > without recompiling kernel? Saying "y" would let users try both drivers. That is up to the distros or other kernel builders to choose. At present, they have no choice but to let the two drivers race to see who gets loaded first or whatever. I imagine that some would prefer to have an option that prevents that. > The description also isn't saying too much. I can't imagine anyone > taking decision advisedly other than "n, as it's the default". On > other hand, what should we put here? The whole comparison of drivers? > Can be hard, but I really think there should be more info. More info could be put in a "---help---" section. The summary line could be different as well, if you can think of a better way to describe the issue. I am open to suggestions. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
