On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:38:43PM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: > > [ 173.145695] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: U iwlagn_tx_agg_start Can proceed: ssn = > > next_recl = 869 > > [ 173.147133] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: U iwl_trans_set_wr_ptrs Q 11 WrPtr: 101 > > [ 173.147545] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: U iwl_trans_tx_queue_set_status Activate > > BA Queue 11 on FIFO 1 > > [ 173.148050] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: Tx aggregation enabled on ra = > > b8:c7:5d:0c:39:88 tid = 0 > > I am missing logs here... You seem to reauthenticate but I can't see disconnection... weird I'll recreate some clean logs in a few minutes.. > > [ 192.805102] wlan0: authenticate with b8:c7:5d:0c:39:87 (try 1) > > [ 192.807392] wlan0: authenticated > > [ 192.814840] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: U iwlagn_tx_agg_stop Can't proceed: ssn > > 1633, next_recl = 139 > > Stop AGG before we are associated ?! > Is that leftovers from the previous association that was torn down ? no idea. > > [ 192.818669] wlan0: moving STA b8:c7:5d:0c:39:88 to state 2 > > [ 192.818939] wlan0: moving STA b8:c7:5d:0c:39:88 to state 1 > > [ 192.819206] wlan0: moving STA b8:c7:5d:0c:39:88 to state 0 > > [ 192.824157] wlan0: associate with b8:c7:5d:0c:39:87 (try 1) > > Associating to another AP ? A band maybe ? I only have one AP. > There are a few AMPDUs issues here but I guess the worst issue you are seeing is due to the passive channel thing. > Does it feel better with 11n disabled ? 5 hours of use this morning with 11n_disabled=1, and not a single problem. I'll re-enable 11n, and get you some cleaner logs shortly. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
