Search Linux Wireless

Re: suggestion for a reasonable value for /sys/module/iwlwifi/parameters/debug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 22:55, Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If I choosed 0x43ff my syslog message files exploded - and I'd like to trouble
>> shoot a problem with my wlan at a ThinkPad T400 (iwlwifi, 5100 AGN controler).
>> The symptoms are that 1-2 times in a hour the network stops working without
>> any message in /var/log/messages (kernel 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.0 tested).
>>
>> Thanks for any advice
>> --
>
> For this kind of issues I added the TX_QUEUES debug flags, but I just
> checked and it is not in 3.2. It is in John's wireless tree though. It
> is bit 31: debug=0x80000000
>
> BTW - John, I have tried many times to understand all this, but stupid
> me, couldn't ever make it. How come a patch is in wireless which in my
> understanding (probably wrong) is supposed to feed the current rc
> cycle (meaning the 3.2-rcX which just ended) and not be in 3.2 stable
> release ? Sorry for the ignorance...
>
Or maybe the wireless tree has already be recreated on top of Linus's
tree (through Dave's tree) after he merged everything ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux