On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 11:39 +0100, Helmut Schaa wrote: > This seems to not serve any purpose anymore, at least all frame > processing afterwards seems to be able to deal with QoS frames. So, > let's save the expensive memmove and just leave the QoS header in the > 802.11 frame for further processing. > > Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > It wouldn't hurt if a second pair of eyes looks through the rx path > to see if there's any possible problem with QoS frames in later rx > handlers. Ok, but I'm on vacation until next year, so I don't know if I'll get to it. In principle, this seems fine, but I'd feel more comfortable if somebody else took another look. Not that I don't trust you, just more eyes see more things :-) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
