On 12/16/2011 12:55 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Hey, The order of functions in phy_n.c is really messy. I wanted to collect related functions, fix order (dependency) and name goups via comments. Is there anything I should know? Patches are going to be huge, tons of lines moved around the phy_n.c :( Are there any objections against that? Any suggestions if I should post one huge patch or few smaller ones?
Several smaller ones always help the reviewer. I would vote for that option. Larry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
