Search Linux Wireless

Re: Some funny code in brcmsmac

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/14/2011 05:19 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
> Franky,
> 
> I was looking through the code and noticed the following in routine 
> wlc_phy_txpwrctrl_pwr_setup_nphy():
> 
>          if (pi->sh->sromrev < 4) {
> 		...
>                  target_pwr_qtrdbm[0] = 13 * 4;
>                  target_pwr_qtrdbm[1] = 13 * 4;
> 		...
>          } else {
>                  chan_freq_range = wlc_phy_get_chan_freq_range_nphy(pi, 0);
>                  switch (chan_freq_range) {
>                  case WL_CHAN_FREQ_RANGE_2G:
> 			...
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[0] =
>                                  pi->nphy_pwrctrl_info[0].max_pwr_2g;
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[1] =
>                                  pi->nphy_pwrctrl_info[1].max_pwr_2g;
> 			...
> 
>                          break;
>                  case WL_CHAN_FREQ_RANGE_5GL:
> 			...
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[0] =
>                                  pi->nphy_pwrctrl_info[0].max_pwr_5gl;
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[1] =
>                                  pi->nphy_pwrctrl_info[1].max_pwr_5gl;
> 			...
>                          break;
>                  case WL_CHAN_FREQ_RANGE_5GM:
> 			...
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[0] =
>                                  pi->nphy_pwrctrl_info[0].max_pwr_5gm;
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[1] =
>                                  pi->nphy_pwrctrl_info[1].max_pwr_5gm;
> 			...
>                          break;
>                  case WL_CHAN_FREQ_RANGE_5GH:
> 			...
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[0] =
>                                  pi->nphy_pwrctrl_info[0].max_pwr_5gh;
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[1] =
>                                  pi->nphy_pwrctrl_info[1].max_pwr_5gh;
> 			...
>                          break;
>                  default:
> 			...
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[0] = 13 * 4;
>                          target_pwr_qtrdbm[1] = 13 * 4;
> 			...
>                          break;
>                  }
>          }
> 
>          target_pwr_qtrdbm[0] = (s8) pi->tx_power_max;
>          target_pwr_qtrdbm[1] = (s8) pi->tx_power_max;
> 
> After going to some effort to customize the target_pwr_qtrdbm array depending on 
> the SPROM version and the particular channel being used, the array is 
> unconditionally overwritten in the end. Although gcc probably optimizes out the 
> statements that are not needed (I have not looked at the generated code.), 
> perhaps the code should be modified to make it clearer for human readers.

Yep. That looks pretty useless to me ;-) I will send a code-redux patch
for this. Feel free to share these kind of observations in a patch email
(so I can remain my lazy self and ack it ;-) ).

> Thanks,
> 
> Larry

Thanks
AvS

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux