On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:35:45PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 07:28:24PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, now that I think about it more, I think the calling convention is > > > really strange. Why pass the channel and bssid when the BSS struct is > > > already known? > > > > > > Why not make cfg80211_roamed() do the BSS lookup (which would also > > > reduce the race for drivers that don't use _bss()) based on the info, > > > and then call a cfg80211_roamed_bss() that doesn't get channel/bssid. > > > > Sure, i'll change it. This looks better. > > Also, i'll create a new patch instead of the next version. Is that patch still coming? -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
