Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 05/23] bcma: add set/mask macros for 16-bit register access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/10/2011 12:45 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2011/12/9 Franky Lin <frankyl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> From: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The BCMA header only had definitions for 32-bit register access. Used
>> those as a template for the 16-bit flavour. Also changed them to inline
>> functions to be on the safe side. As offset parameter is used twice there
>> would be a problem when used like this: bcma_set32(core, offset++, val);
>>
> 
> What is an advantage of static inline over define?
> 

Hi Rafał,

Apart from the example given in the commit message the CodingStyle
documentation states a preference for inline functions. One advantage I
can come up with is type checking by the compiler.

Gr. AvS

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux