On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:15:38 +0100, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Question two: I submitted pfast_head_drop to drop more outdated data > instead of new data. Back in time I thought TCP _may_ experience benefits > because more up-to-date SACK data packets are saved. Are there any other > TCP advantages with head drop policy? Small comment: pfast_head_drop was intended for UDP. E.g. OLSR messages, regular GPS reporting and the like. TCP was not the focus at that time. HGN -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html