On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Eliad Peller <eliad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Thu 01-12-11 12:59:12, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >>> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:55:38AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> > > [ 349.316070] iwl3945_rs_free_sta rs_sta f4be1ac0 >>> > > [ 349.316076] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> > > [ 349.316097] WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/iwl-3945-rs.c:438 iwl3945_rs_free_sta+0x33/0x42 [iwl3945]() >>> > >>> > Johannes pointed on irc that this problem is most likely caused by: >>> > >>> > commit f785d83a19bca326f79d127a413e35769afc0105 >>> > Author: Eliad Peller <eliad@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> > Date: Mon Aug 8 16:50:22 2011 +0300 >>> > >>> > mac80211: clear sta.drv_priv on reconfiguration >>> > >>> > Michal, could you confirm that? If that is the root of the problem, we >>> > need patch for iwlegacy (and iwlwifi) that allocate separate memory for >>> > rc structures. >> Actually this require quite big changes in iwlegacy at least, perhaps >> also in iwlwifi. I prefer to revert commit as temporary fix, and add >> memset(0) to drivers .add_sta callback, in drivers which need it. After >> changing iwlegcy/iwlwifi we could move memset(0) back to ieee80211_reconfig(). >> >> Eliad, thoughts? >> > i don't really care about temporarily reverting it. > but maybe you can just add an "initialized" flag to iwl3945_rs_sta, > and check it on free_sta? > Isnt't the mainline handling "user-friendliness first" by reverting "buggy" commits (especially if there is no fix/patch in sight)? A proper fix can be done later. Just my 2 cents. - Sedat - > Eliad. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html