Hi 2011/11/24 Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 19:39 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> > And one more thing, if you do not mind. >> > 'ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session' tests tx_tid->state for >> > HT_AGG_STATE_STOPPING holding only spinlock on sta->lock. >> > '___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session' sets this bit when spin lock on >> > sta->lock is not being held. It seems to be that this could lead to >> > problems if these two functions get called at about same time (which >> > could easily happen when this patch is applied). Although actual >> > window when lock is not help is really small. But I think the way it >> > is currently done could still lead to problems. I think >> > 'set_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_STOPPING, &tid_tx->state);' should be moved up >> > to be covered by spin lock. I can include this as a part of next >> > version of my patch. I'd really appreciate your thoughts about this. >> >> Yeah that does indeed seem like an issue > > Actually I think the right way to fix it would be the change below, do > you agree? I think just moving the set_bit doesn't help because other > code might call right into ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session (or with just > two underscores on front) > > johannes > > --- wireless-testing.orig/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c 2011-11-09 10:07:34.000000000 +0100 > +++ wireless-testing/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c 2011-11-24 19:44:51.000000000 +0100 > @@ -162,6 +162,12 @@ int ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session(stru > return -ENOENT; > } > > + /* if we're already stopping ignore any new requests to stop */ > + if (test_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_STOPPING, &tid_tx->state)) { > + spin_unlock_bh(&sta->lock); > + return -EALREADY; > + } > + > if (test_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_WANT_START, &tid_tx->state)) { > /* not even started yet! */ > ieee80211_assign_tid_tx(sta, tid, NULL); > @@ -170,6 +176,8 @@ int ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session(stru > return 0; > } > > + set_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_STOPPING, &tid_tx->state); > + > spin_unlock_bh(&sta->lock); > > #ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG > @@ -177,8 +185,6 @@ int ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session(stru > sta->sta.addr, tid); > #endif /* CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG */ > > - set_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_STOPPING, &tid_tx->state); > - > del_timer_sync(&tid_tx->addba_resp_timer); > > /* > > > Yes, this patch does make sense to me. -- Truthfully yours, Martynov Nikolay. Email: mar.kolya@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html