> On Saturday 19 November 2011 23:15:34 Max Filippov wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 November 2011 00:15:42 Michael Büsch wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:12:03 +0100
> > > > Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > BTW: I always wondered if it would make sense to have a
> > > > > cached rx skb ready in p54spi_rx(). This way we don't
> > > > > have to do DMA onto the stack [which is really ugly and
> > > > > possibly illegal] and might even get a better rx
> > > > > performance. I could write the code but as you know I don't
> > > > > have the hardware to test it.
> > > >
> > > > I'll test it, if you can come up with a patch.
> > > ---
> > > [RFC] p54spi: don't DMA onto the stack
> > >
> > > DMA transfers should not be done onto the kernel stack.
> >
> > What about p54spi_read32, it does the same thing?
> AFAIK no, p54spi_read32 and p54spi_write16/32 uses PIO.
Initial p54spi_rx transfer with the kludge in place is 4 bytes long as well.
> Of course, I don't know 100% just the docs from johannes' says so :-D.
That's right, drivers/spi/omap2_mcspi.c says that:
/* use PIO for small transfers, avoiding DMA setup/teardown overhead and
* cache operations; better heuristics consider wordsize and bitrate.
*/
#define DMA_MIN_BYTES 160
> > I have tested this patch, it works, no measurable rx speed boost though
> > (~6.1Mbit/sec in iperf as either server or client).
> I guess that number comes from unicast plain udp testing, right. Do you
> know if the performance can be improved by setting the mtu to 2274
> [ifconfig wlanX mtu 2274] on both client and AP/server?
~6.7Mbit/sec
> > > - if (len <= READAHEAD_SZ) {
> > > - memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), rx_head + 1, len);
> > > + if (len <= READAHEAD) {
> > > + skb_put(skb, len);
> > > } else {
> > > - memcpy(skb_put(skb, READAHEAD_SZ), rx_head + 1, READAHEAD_SZ);
> > > + skb_put(skb, READAHEAD);
> > > p54spi_spi_read(priv, SPI_ADRS_DMA_DATA,
> > > - skb_put(skb, len - READAHEAD_SZ),
> > > - len - READAHEAD_SZ);
> > > + skb_put(skb, len - READAHEAD),
> > > + len - READAHEAD);
> > > }
> >
> > I have also tested this patch without this (READAHEAD_SZ) kludge.
> > It appears to work now.
> well, there's one more thing: what happens when there's just
> a single read. .e.g.:
[...snip...]
Highly unstable link and lots of "rx request of zero bytes" in the dmesg log.
Thanks.
-- Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
