Search Linux Wireless

Re: rewriting powersave

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johannes,

Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Since clearly it is possible to implement this in the lower layers, I'm
> thinking we should provide an implementation that the drivers can use to
> implement powersave and be in category 4 from mac80211's POV.

I think this is the way to go, even I was skeptic when you first
mentioned about. We really need to make mac80211 powersave
implementation more simple and this is a clean way to do it. And I
would assume that all new (sane) hardware designs belong to category 4
so this would only affect existing drivers.

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux