On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:14 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 19:48 +0100, Michael Büsch wrote:
>>
>> + case SSB_DEV_ETHERNET:
>> + if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI) {
>> + if (bus->host_pci->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM &&
>> + (bus->host_pci->device & 0xFF00) == 0x4300) {
>> + /* This is a dangling ethernet core on a
>> + * wireless device. Ignore it. */
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + break;
>
> Do you also need to check for (bus->host_pci->device / 1000) == 43?
> Or do the chips with 5-digit 'decimal' IDs not have the Ethernet cores?
>
> Would it be better to invert the test and check for != 0x4400?
I do not know of any Broadcom wireless device with a decimal PCI ID
(as opposed to a decimal Chip ID).
>
> --
> dwmw2
>
--
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
