On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Eliad Peller wrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx>
Use kstrtoul, etc instead of the now deprecated strict_strtoul, etc.
A semantic patch rule for the kstrtoul case is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression a,b;
{int,long} *c;
@@
-strict_strtoul
+kstrtoul
(a,b,c)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx>
---
net/mac80211/debugfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u -p a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static ssize_t uapsd_max_sp_len_write(st
return -EFAULT;
buf[len] = '\0';
- ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 0, &val);
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
if (ret)
return -EINVAL;
maybe while cleaning it up change copy_from_user +
strict_stroul/kstroul -> kstroul_from_user?
Thanks for the suggestion. I will look into it.
julia
