On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 12:58 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote: > hi Guy, > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Guy Eilam <guy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Set the TX rate of probe requests during scanning according to the > > no_cck flag in the scan request struct. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guy Eilam <guy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > [...] > > > @@ -243,7 +242,12 @@ void wl1271_scan_stm(struct wl1271 *wl) > > > > case WL1271_SCAN_STATE_2GHZ_ACTIVE: > > band = IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ; > > - rate = wl1271_tx_min_rate_get(wl, wl->bitrate_masks[band]); > > + if (wl->scan.req->no_cck) > > + rate = wl1271_tx_min_rate_get(wl, > > + CONF_TX_RATE_MASK_BASIC_P2P); > > + else > > + rate = wl1271_tx_min_rate_get(wl, > > + CONF_TX_RATE_MASK_BASIC); > > on a second thought, this seems a bit wrong. > i think we should consider the configured bitrate_masks when scanning. > maybe just mask-out the cck rates? Any follow up on this? -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
