On 10/28/2011 01:09 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 22:11 -0700, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:struct vif_params { int use_4addr; int disable_11n; + int disable_ht40; };All the comments on patch 1 apply -- per connection parameter, capability flag etc. I do wonder if it would be worthwhile to make it a u32 "connection flags" or so instead of defining them separately.
I don't care either way. If you want a single variable to hold the flags that is easy enough. We'd need to pass in a mask to allow user-space to change only a subset of flags at a time though. Thanks, Ben
johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
