On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/25/2011 10:26 AM, Eliad Peller wrote: >> >> Some buggy APs (and even P2P_GO) don't advertise their >> basic rates in the association response. >> >> In such case, use the min supported rate as the >> basic rate. > > I seem to vaguely remember discussing using mandatory rates, did we? > yes. the problem with the mandatory rates is that we shouldn't use CCK rates when working as p2p_cli (there *shouldn't* be such GO, but this was an actual case...) > Also this seems like a last resort fallback, I'd really also try using the > probe response information -- we should have that information still at this > point. But maybe that doesn't make sense -- fix the APs instead! > right. > I'd really like a (debug?) message here though. This is a stupid AP, and I > will need to know if I'm debugging some throughput issues etc. sure. i'll add it. thanks for the review. Eliad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
