On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 19:42 +0200, Guy Eilam wrote: > > Yeah but if you add a wiphy flag and the bits into struct wiphy, then > > you can save the function pointer which seems nicer? > > You're absolutely right. > I'll send another version of the patch that will have a flag and > bitmap in the wiphy struct. Also I believe that means you don't need patch 2 at all so that's kinda nice :-) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
