On 2011-10-18 4:30 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:19 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >> For local->tmp_channel == NULL and local->scan_channel == NULL >> ieee80211_cfg_on_oper_channel() will return false if >> local->oper_channel != local->hw.conf.channel, >> hece we do not properly go back to oper_channel from tmp_channel. > > Huh, good catch. > >> Does patch have sense? > > Let's see what Ben says. It seems a bit like the > ieee80211_cfg_on_oper_channel() test there should be inverted instead of > removed? > >> Could it fixes problems we are talking >> in this thread? > > Yes, could be related, also some issue Jouni and Reinette have been > seeing with P2P might be related as well. Just remembered this old patch, also related to this part: http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c1311607763%2d12603%2d3%2dgit%2dsend%2demail%2deliad%40wizery.com%3e - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
